Economic Growth (Edexcel IGCSE Economics)
An Introduction to the Macroeconomic Objectives
Spec point —
2.1.1a
-
Macroeconomic Objectives are goals set by the government aimed at improving the overall **economic performance **of a country as well as the quality of life of its citizens
-
The government aims to achieve these objectives through**** the use of macroeconomic policies
-
It can be difficult to achieve some outcomes simultaneously
- E.g High economic growth and stable price levels can be in conflict with one another, as growth can drive upthe general price level
Governments set specific macroeconomic objectives as they want their economies to grow and prosper
The macroeconomic objectives
- Economic growth: this is the annual increase in the level of national output as measured by the gross domestic product (GDP)
- Low and stable rate of inflation: generally, an inflation target of 2% is set
- Low unemployment: the lower the unemployment level, the more productive are the human factors of production - and the higher the nation's output
- Stable current account balance of payments: the current account primarily considers the value of trade in a nation's exports and imports. Wild fluctuations are a sign of an unstable economy
- Environmental protection: rapid economic growth often occurs at the expense of the environment, which has a knock-on effect on citizens. Protecting the environment is a key 21st century goal
- Equity in the distribution of income: the wider the disparity between rich and poor, the more socially unstable an economy becomes
Investigating Economic Growth
Spec point —
1.1.1e
-
Economic growth is the annual increase in the level of national output as measured by the gross domestic product (GDP)
- GDP is the total value for all goods and services produced in an economy in a year
-
Many developed nations (UK included) have an annual target rate of 2–3%
- This is considered to be sustainable growth
- Growth at this rate is less likely to cause excessive demand pull inflation
-
Politicians often use it as a metric of the effectiveness of their policies and leadership
-
Economic growth has positive impacts on confidence, consumption, investment, employment, incomes, living standards and government budgets
-
Strong economic growth means higher incomes, lower unemployment rates and better government budgets
-
Sustainable economic growth will have less demand-pull inflationary pressures or excessive environmental pressure
Following the dismal covid figures of 2020, the UK economy rebounded strongly in 2021
(Source: Macrotrends)
Graph analysis
Summary of Economic Growth Trends in the UK Since 1998
| 1998-2007 | 2008-2015 | 2016-2019 | 2020 - |
|---|---|---|---|
| - Steady growth fluctuating between 2-4% | - Global financial crisis followed by rapid bounce back due to government intervention - and then steady growth | - Gradual disinflation is possibly due to future expectations regarding the impact of the Brexit vote | - Supply chain issues due to Brexit. Decreased consumption due to the impact of Covid 19 - These created a deep recession (short-lived due to government intervention) |
Worked Example Calculate, to two decimal places, the percentage change in GDP per capita in South Africa between 2021 and 2022. You are advised to show your working. (2)
GDP per Capita US$ 2021 2022 7,073 7,629 Step 1: Substitute values into a percentage formula
$\text{Percentage} \text{change} = \frac{new - old}{old} \mathrm{x} 100
= \frac{7 , 629 - 7 , 073}{7 , 073} \mathrm{x} 100
= 7.86 % $ 1 mark
1 mark for correct working and 1 mark for the final answer
Limitations of Using GDP to Measure Growth
Spec point —
2.1.1a
-
Using GDP as a measure of economic health of a country has numerous limitations
-
A better measure of economic growth is GDP per capita (GDP / the population) Limitations of Using GDP to Measure Growth | Limitation | Explanation | |---|---| | Lack of information provided
on inequality | - The distribution of income in an economy is provided as an average (GDP/capita)
- The differences in the standard of living within the same country can be significant | | Quality of goods and services | - GDP provides no information on the increase/decrease in the quality of goods/services over time
- If quality worsens but prices are lower, then the standard of living is judged to have increased
- The poor quality may actually have decreased the standard of living | | Does not include unpaid/voluntary work | - If it included voluntary/unpaid work, then GDP/capita would be higher
- E.g some economies have a high amount of family child care provision. This increases standards of living but is not recorded in any way | | Differences in hours worked | - GDP data does not capture the amount of time taken to produce the GDP/capita
- In one country, where it takes less time to generate income than in a similar country, the standard of living would actually be higher | | Environmental factors | - GDP does not capture the environmental and health impacts of generating income within a country (externalities)
- In one country, where there are fewer externalities in generating income, the standard of living would be higher |- It shows the mean wealth of each citizen in a country
- This makes it easier to compare standards of living between countries. For example, Switzerland has a much higher GDP/capita than Burundi
Was this revision note helpful?
Build on this topic