Coastal Management (Edexcel IGCSE Geography)
Coastal Strategies
Spec point —
4GE1-S3.043
-
Management of coastal regions is performed by identifying coastal cells
-
This breaks a long coastline into manageable sections and helps identify two related risks:
- The risk of erosion and land retreat
- The risk of flooding
-
Identification of the risks allows resources to be allocated effectively to reduce the impacts
-
The 'cost-benefit' is easier to calculate using coastal cells
Shoreline Management Plans
Spec point —
4GE1-S3.043
-
Shoreline Management Plans (SMP) set out an approach to managing a coastline from flooding and erosional risk
- The plans aim to reduce the risk to people, settlements, agricultural land and natural environments (salt marshes etc.)
-
There are four approaches available for coastal management, with differing costs and consequences:
- Hold the line
- Advance the line
- Managed realignment
- Do nothing
Hold the line
- Long-term approach and the most costly
- Build and maintain coastal defences so the current position of the shoreline remains the same
- Hard engineering is the most dominant method used, with soft engineering used to support
Advance
- Build new defences to extend the existing shoreline
- Involves land reclamation
- Hard and soft engineering is used
Managed realignment
- The coastline is allowed to move naturally
- Processes are monitored and directed when and where necessary
- The most natural approach to coastal defence
- Mostly soft engineering with some hard engineering to support
Do nothing
- The cheapest method, but the most controversial of the options
- The coast is allowed to erode and retreat landward
- No investment is made in protecting the coastline or defending against flooding, regardless of any previous intervention
Which approach to coastal management?
-
Decisions about which approach to apply are complex and depend on:
- the economic value of the resources that would be protected, e.g. land, homes, etc.
- engineering solutions – it might not be possible to 'hold the line' for moving landforms such as spits, or unstable cliffs
- cultural and ecological value of land – historic sites and areas of unusual diversity
- community pressure – local campaigns to protect the region
- social value of communities – long-standing, historic communities
Hard Engineering Methods
Spec point —
4GE1-S3.043
- Hard engineering involves building some form of sea defence, usually from concrete, wood or rock
- Structures are expensive to build and need to be maintained
- Defences work against the power of the waves
- Each type of defence has its strengths and weaknesses
- Protecting one area can impact regions further along the coast, which results in faster erosion and flooding
- Hard engineering is used when settlements and expensive installations (power stations, etc.) are at risk – the economic benefit is greater than the costs of building structures
Hard engineering strategies
Seawall
- A wall, usually concrete, and curved outwards to deflect the power of the waves
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Most effective at preventing both erosion and flooding (if the wall is high enough) | - Very expensive to build and maintain - It can be damaged if the material is not maintained in front of the wall - Restricts access to the beach - Unsightly to look at |
Groynes
- Wood, rock or steel piling built at right angles to the shore
- Groynes trap beach material being moved by longshore drift
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Slows down beach erosion - Creates wider beaches - Cheap in comparison to other hard engineering methods | - Stops material moving down the coast, where the material may have been building up and protecting the base of a cliff elsewhere - Starves other beaches of sand. Wood groynes need maintenance to prevent wood rot - Makes walking along the shoreline difficult |
Rip-rap
- Large boulders which are piled up to protect a stretch of coast
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Cheaper method of construction - Works to absorb wave energy from the base of cliffs and sea walls | - Boulders can be eroded or dislodged during heavy storm - Heavy and expensive to transport |
Gabions
- Wire cages filled with stone, concrete, sand, etc.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Cheapest form of coastal defence - Cages absorb wave energy - Can be stacked at the base of a seawall or cliffs | - Wire cages can break and they need to be securely tied down - Not as efficient as other coastal defence |
Revetments
- Sloping wooden or concrete fence with an open plank structure
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Work to break the force of the waves - Traps beach material behind them - Set at the base of cliffs or in front of the sea wall - Cheaper than sea walls but not as effective | - Not effective in stormy conditions - Can make beach inaccessible for people - Regular maintenance is necessary - Visually unattractive |
Off-shore barriers
- Large concrete blocks, rocks and boulders are sunk offshore
- These alter wave direction and dissipate wave energy
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Effective at breaking wave energy before reaching the shore - Beach material is built up - Low maintenance - Maintains natural beach appearance | - Expensive to build - Can be removed in heavy storms - Can be unattractive - Prevents surfing, sailing and fishing |
Soft Engineering Methods
Spec point —
4GE1-S3.043
-
Soft engineering works with natural processes rather than against them
-
Usually cheaper and do not damage the appearance of the coast
-
They are considered to be a more sustainable approach to coastal protection
- However, they are often not as effective as hard engineering methods
Beach replenishment
- Pumping or dumping sand and shingle back onto a beach to replace eroded material
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Beaches absorb wave energy - Widens beachfront | - It has to be repeated regularly, which is expensive - Can impact sediment transportation down the coast |
Fences, hedging and replacing vegetation
- These help to stabilise sand dunes or beaches
- Additional vegetation or fencing also reduces wind erosion
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Cheap method to protect against flooding and erosion | - It's hard to protect larger areas of coastline cliffs |
Cliff regrading
- The angle of a cliff is reduced to reduce mass movement
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - Prevents sudden loss of large sections of cliff - Regrading can also slow down wave-cut notching at the base of cliffs as wave energy is slowed | - Does not stop cliff erosion |
Managed retreat
- Existing coastal defences are abandoned, allowing the sea to flood inland until it reaches higher land or a new line of defences
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| - No expensive construction costs - Creates new habitats such as salt marshes | - Disruptive to people where land and homes are lost - The cost of relocation can be expensive - Compensation to people and businesses may not be paid |
- There are conflicting views about using a particular type of engineering for coastal defence
- Most coastal managers aim to use a range of methods depending on the value of what is being protected
- This method is known as Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM)
- ICMZ aims to use a combination of methods to meet as many stakeholder needs as possible
Case Study - The Holderness Coast
Spec point —
4GE1-S3.043
Case Study – The Holderness Coast
- The Holderness Coastline is located on the East Coast of Yorkshire and runs for 61 km
- It stretches from Flamborough Head in the north down to Spurn Head, where it meets the Humber Estuary in the south
- It is the fastest-eroding coastline in Europe at 2 m per year

Map showing the Holderness Coast
-
The cliffs are made of soft boulder clay and chalk deposited during the last ice age
- This makes them easily eroded by hydraulic action and abrasion during storm events
-
Longshore drift is the dominant process along the coast
- This creates narrow beaches, which give less protection from erosion as wave power is not reduced
-
The coastline directly faces the North Sea, which gives destructive waves a long fetch (travel long distances)
- This increases wave energy and therefore high erosive energy when they reach the shore
Management of the Holderness Coast
-
Bridlington is protected by a 4.7 km long sea wall
-
Gabions have been built at Skipsea
-
Hornsea's cliffs are formed from soft boulder clay
- As a popular tourist destination, management is aimed at protecting hotels, and arcades and creating a sandy beach
- Hornsea has spent money on repairing its wooden groynes at a cost of £5.2 million
- It also has a concrete seawall
- Recently, a stone and steel gabion along with a concrete revetment have been built south of Hornsea, helping to protect the caravan park
-
Riprap, at a cost of £2 million, and groynes and beach nourishment at Mappleton have produced a sandy beach and protect the town
-
Withernsea has a sea wall, groynes, riprap and beach nourishment to widen the beach and reduce wave energy
-
Approximately, 2.25% of all UK gas comes through the gas terminal at Easington and £4.5 million was spent on riprap, but the scheme protects the terminal and not the village
-
Spurn Head is protected with groynes and rock armour
Conflicts
- Careful management of coastal regions is necessary to ensure sustainability
- Conflict arises when coastal development is seen as being given a higher priority than overall coastal conservation
- Management along the Holderness Coast has been successful in part, with the village of Mappleton and the B1242 road no longer at risk from erosion
- Due to the use of groynes at Mappleton, sediment has been prevented from moving south, which has increased erosion at Great Cowden
- Erosion has destroyed farms, along with the loss of 100 chalets at the Golden Sands Holiday Park
- Locals have disagreed about where sea defences are located, especially if community land is not protected
- Some sea defences negatively impact tourism and reduce the amount of money coming into the area
- Spurn Head is at risk of losing habitats due to a lack of sediment to maintain the spit
- Overall, maintaining coastal defences is expensive and the cost may be too great to continue defending an area that is eroding quickly and will continue to erode
Was this revision note helpful?