Proving the laws of logarithms
Excerpt: Starting with some numeric examples of log laws, students are asked to generalise and then arrange and complete a set of cards to form a proof of one of the laws. This can be extended to cover the other log laws hence encouraging students to understand why they are true.
Warm-up
Take a look at these results
How can you change the input values so that the equations still hold?
What happens if you change the base of the logarithms?
Can you state generalised versions of these results? What conditions must the base and the inputs satisfy?
Proof sort
The cards below can be arranged to give a proof of the statement
for any and , but .
Can you arrange the cards to give a convincing proof? You may need to include some extra algebraic steps or explanations if you think they would help to make the argument clearer or more convincing.
You might want to print out the cards and rearrange them.
Some blank cards have been included in the cards for printing in case you would like to use them to fill in some details.
One challenge we face when trying to prove something is making it clear what our proof is building on. Our starting point here is that we know how to manipulate indices or powers and we know a relationship between indices and logarithms. We will use results about manipulating indices to prove a result about manipulating logarithms.
Therefore .
We can rewrite these equations to give us two equations involving powers.
Let and .
Therefore , as required.
and
We will prove that for any and , but .
We would like to express in terms of and . If we try to express in terms of , we might be able to say more about .
Solution
Here is one possible way of proving the result (with some extra statements added).
We will prove that for any and , but .
We know how to manipulate powers, so we could try to turn expressions involving logarithms into expressions involving powers. To do this, it might be helpful to name and .
Let and .
We can rewrite these equations to give us two equations involving powers.
and
We would like to express in terms of and . If we try to express in terms of , we might be able to say more about .
Therefore .
Therefore , as required.
Adapting the ideas
Can you adapt the ideas in the proof to produce convincing proofs of the following results?
What conditions must satisfy?