Can we find a sequence of solutions to the equation
Review questionbeyond the specification map
Beyond the specification map. Pell-equation solution sequences via recurrence — number-theory iteration, not AP/GP. It is kept in the library for extra maths practice, not as specification-point coverage.
Can we find a sequence of solutions to the equation x2−2y2=1?
Question
Find a pair of positive integers, x1 and y1, that solve the equation (x1)2−2(y1)2=1.
Given integers a, b, we define two sequences x1, x2, x3, … and y1, y2, y3, … by setting xn+1=3xn+4yn,yn+1=axn+byn,for n≥1. Find positive values for a, b such that (xn+1)2−2(yn+1)2=(xn)2−2(yn)2.
Find a pair of integers X, Y which satisfy X2−2Y2=1 such that X>Y>50.
(Using the values of a and b found in the second part) what is the approximate value of xn/yn as n increases?
Suggestion
Can you combine what we know to form an equation involving a and b?
How can we use what we have learnt from (i) and (ii)?
Solution
By inspection or by trying a few small values, we can find the solution x1=3, y1=2.
Substituting the expressions for xn and yn into this equation, we get (3xn+4yn)2−2(axn+byn)2=(xn)2−2(yn)2 that is, (8−2a2)(xn)2+(24−4ab)xnyn+(18−2b2)(yn)2=0.
This equation will certainly hold if all three coefficients are zero. In this case, we have
2a2=8,4ab=24,2b2=18.
These equations DO solve, to give a=±2,b=±3. Since we also require that a and b are positive, we have a=2 and b=3.
We start with our previously found small solution, x1=3 and y1=2.
Now we can use the sequences defined above with a=2,b=3 to generate new solutions. We have x1=3,y1=2;x2=3×3+4×2=17,y2=2×3+3×2=12;x3=3×17+4×12=99,y3=2×17+3×12=70. So X=99 and Y=70 are such a pair.
Let’s suppose that ynxn tends to a limit L as n tends to infinity.
Then for large n,L≈yn+1xn+1=2xn+3yn3xn+4yn=2ynxn+33ynxn+4≈2L+33L+4.
Thus L≈2L+33L+4, which becomes equality when we allow n to tend to infinity. Thus by solving the equation, L=2.
Alternatively, we could argue like this:
For all the pairs (xn,yn), we have (xn)2−2(yn)2=1.
Also, because of the way xn and yn are constructed, both form increasing sequences.
So if we divide through by (yn)2, we see that (ynxn)2−2=(yn)21≈0for large n, so xn/yn≈2, since xn and yn are both positive.
This question may remind you of Staircase sequences.