Beyond the specification map. Real-index binomial approximation ((1±x)^{±1/2}) — P3 Series bearing; P1 1.6.1 covers positive integer n only. It is kept in the library for extra maths practice, not as specification-point coverage.
Prove that, if x is so small that its cube and higher powers can be neglected, 1−x1+x=1+x+2x2. By taking x=91, prove that 5 is approximately equal to 81181.
Suggestion
Can we rewrite the left-hand side as a product of functions that we do know how to expand?
Solution
The binomial theorem says that, if r is any real number and x<1, then (1+x)r=1+rx+2!r(r−1)x2+3!r(r−1)(r−2)x3+…b. Since x is close enough to zero so that its cube and higher powers can be neglected, this can be shortened to say that (1+x)r≈1+rx+2!r(r−1)x2.
Now, as we can write
1−x1+x=(1+x)1/2×(1−x)−1/2
we can therefore use the binomial theorem to say that
Since x=91 is close to zero, the expansion that we proved in the first part of the question is reasonable.
The left-hand side becomes 1−x1+x=8/910/9=810=45=25 while the right-hand side becomes 1+x+2x2=1+91+1621=162162+18+1=162181. That is, 25≈162181 so on multiplying through by 2, 5≈81181 as we were aiming to show.
In fact, 81181−5≈0.0015. The approximation is good!
It is, however, far from being the “best” fraction approximation for
5
using small denominators. We have
1738−572161−5≈0.0008,≈0.00004,
which are far better. These are found from the continued fraction expansion of 5.