Can we find ∑r=1n2/(r2+4r+3)?
Question
Express r2+4r+32 in partial fractions.
Hence, or otherwise, prove that ∑r=1nr2+4r+32=65−(n+2)(n+3)2n+5.
Suggestion
We know how to rewrite the expression using partial fractions – maybe we can use this to simplify the sum?
Maybe we should try writing the sum out explicitly term by term?
Solution
First we factorise the denominator as r2+4r+32=(r+1)(r+3)2.
Next, it makes sense to guess that there exist numbers
A
and
B
such that we have the identity
(r+1)(r+3)2=r+1A+r+3B.
Forming a common denominator for the right hand side of this, we find that (r+1)(r+3)2=(r+1)(r+3)A(r+3)+B(r+1)=(r+1)(r+3)(A+B)r+3A+B. Since the numerator must be equal to 2 for all values of r, we obtain the system of equations A+B=0,3A+B=2. Subtracting these equations gives 2A=2, so A=1 and therefore B=−1.
Hence r2+4r+32=r+11−r+31.
An alternative approach, starting from equation
(partial)
, is to multiply both sides by
(r+1)(r+3)
, giving
2=A(r+3)+B(r+1).
We could proceed as before, expanding the right hand side to get the identity 2=(A+B)r+3A+B. Alternatively, as this identity (identity) is true for all values of r, we can substitute in r=−1 to obtain 2=2A, and hence A=1, and then substitute in r=−3 to obtain 2=−2B, giving B=−1.
For this part of the question, the idea is to use our partial fractions result to split the sum of interest into two simpler sums.
Substituting in the result from the previous part of the question, we obtain
r=1∑nr2+4r+32=r=1∑n(r+11−r+31)=r=1∑nr+11−r=1∑nr+31,
where we have split the single sum into two separate sums on the second line.
This still looks rather intimidating, so let’s do away with the summation notation and write out the sums explicitly:
r=1∑nr2+4r+32=(21+31+41+…b+n+11)−(41+51+…b+n+11+n+21+n+31).
Now it is clear that the bold terms in the first sum are cancelled by corresponding terms in the second. Therefore, we are left with
r=1∑nr2+4r+32=(21+31)−(n+21+n+31)=65−(n+2)(n+3)2n+5.