Policies To Correct Imbalances on the Current Account (Cambridge International A-Level Economics)
Government policy objective of stability of the current account
Spec point —
6.5.1
-
Current account stability refers to a government's objective of avoiding persistent and large imbalances - either deficits or surpluses - on the current account of the balance of payments
- A persistent current account deficit is unsustainable in the long run as it requires continuous financing through the financial account - building up foreign liabilities and increasing future primary income outflows
- A persistent current account surplus may attract international political pressure and reflect suppressed domestic consumption, reducing living standards below productive capacity
-
Governments therefore aim for a broadly balanced current account over time rather than targeting an exact figure in any single period
Achieving current account stability may cause conflicts
- The objective of current account stability may conflict with other macroeconomic objectives

Potential macroeconomic conflicts which may arise in trying to achieve stability on the current account balance
- Policies to reduce a deficit (e.g. deflating domestic demand) may increase unemployment and reduce growth
- Policies to stimulate growth may worsen the current account by increasing import demand
- Achieving current account stability while maintaining low inflation, full employment and growth simultaneously is rarely possible - policy trade-offs are inevitable
Effect of fiscal policies on the current account
-
Contractionary fiscal policy (higher taxes, lower government spending) reduces domestic aggregate demand, lowering household incomes and reducing expenditure on imports
- The current account deficit narrows as import spending falls
- However, lower growth and higher unemployment are likely side effects - a significant policy trade-off
-
Expansionary fiscal policy worsens the current account as rising incomes pull in more imports
-
Fiscal policy works through the demand channel - it affects the current account indirectly by changing the level of domestic income rather than directly targeting trade competitiveness
Effect of monetary policies on the current account
-
Higher interest rates attract hot money inflows from foreign investors seeking better returns, increasing demand for the domestic currency and causing an appreciation
- Appreciation makes exports more expensive and imports cheaper, tending to worsen the trade balance
- However, higher interest rates also reduce domestic consumption and investment, lowering import demand - a partially offsetting effect
-
Lower interest rates cause depreciation of the exchange rate, making exports cheaper and imports dearer, tending to improve the trade balance
-
The effectiveness of monetary policy on the current account depends critically on price elasticities of demand for exports and imports
Effect of supply-side policies on the current account
-
Supply-side policies improve the current account by raising the productive efficiency and international competitiveness of domestic firms
-
Improved competitiveness lowers unit costs, making exports more price competitive in world markets and reducing dependence on imports
-
Examples include:
- Investment in education and training - raises labour productivity, lowering unit labour costs
- Research and development subsidies - encourages innovation, improving export quality and non-price competitiveness
- Deregulation - reduces costs of production, improving efficiency
-
Supply-side policies address the structural causes of a current account deficit rather than merely suppressing demand - they are therefore regarded as the most sustainable long-run solution
-
The main limitation is that supply-side policies operate slowly - improvements in productivity and competitiveness take years to feed through into export performance
Effect of protectionist policies on the current account
-
Tariffs *raise the price of imports, reducing import volumes and narrowing the trade deficit directly
-
Import quotas limit the volume of imports entering the country, directly reducing import expenditure
-
Export subsidies lower the price of exports in foreign markets, boosting export demand and improving the trade balance
-
Protectionist policies can improve the current account in the short run but carry significant risks:
- Trading partners may retaliate with their own protectionist measures, reducing export demand and potentially worsening the current account
- They reduce competitive pressure on domestic firms, allowing inefficiency to persist rather than addressing the underlying causes of the deficit
- They may violate WTO rules, exposing the country to trade disputes and sanctions
- Consumer welfare falls as import prices rise
Summary table of policy effects
| Policy | Mechanism | Effect on current account | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contractionary fiscal | - Reduces domestic demand and import spending | - Improves deficit | - Raises unemployment; slows growth |
| Lower interest rates / depreciation | - Makes exports cheaper, imports dearer | - Improves deficit | - Import cost-push inflation |
| Supply-side | - Raises productivity and export competitiveness | - Improves deficit sustainably | - Slow to take effect |
| Tariffs / quotas | - Directly restricts import volumes | - Improves deficit | - Risk of retaliation; WTO rules |
| Export subsidies | - Lowers export prices, boosts export demand | - Improves deficit | - Risk of retaliation; fiscal cost |
Worked Example A government aims to reduce unemployment through expansionary fiscal policy and borrows more from commercial banks, increasing its borrowing requirement. What will be the result?
A. - a decrease in the budget deficit
B. - a decrease in the national debt
C. - an increase in the balance of payments deficit on the current account
D. - an increase in interest rates
Final answer: Answer: D
When the government borrows more from commercial banks, it increases the demand for loanable funds in the financial system - competition for available funds pushes up the price of borrowing, which is the rate of interest
This is the crowding out mechanism - government borrowing competes with private sector borrowing, driving up interest rates and potentially reducing private investment
Worked solution
- Option A is incorrect - borrowing more to fund expenditure increases the budget deficit, not decreases it
- Option B is incorrect - additional borrowing adds to the national debt, not reduces it
- Option C is the trap - students who know that expansionary fiscal policy increases incomes and therefore imports may select this; while this is a valid long-run consequence of expansionary fiscal policy, the direct and immediate result of increased government borrowing from commercial banks is upward pressure on interest rates, not a current account change
Exam Hint When evaluating policies to correct a current account deficit, always consider both the mechanism and the limitations - a policy that improves the current account may simultaneously worsen other macroeconomic objectives.
Supply-side policy is generally the strongest evaluation point as it addresses the root causes of uncompetitiveness rather than suppressing demand or distorting trade.
Was this revision note helpful?